I wanted to make sure the result was the same before I proceeded with this method and the differences have got me a bit stumped.
Maybe it's normal for this to happen with different software? Only reason I came across it is because I recently discovered that it's a little bit quicker for me to open the mxf files I'm working with in audacity and save the required audio that way than it is for me to render a wav through vegas. That's after I've saved the files (one via make stereo track > export as 24 bit wav in Audacity, the other by rendering as a wav in Vegas) and then opened them again in Audacity for the purpose of taking a screenshot of the graph.īy default Vegas has track fx enabled for audio but I've tried turning that off as well as muting the video before rendering and I still get subtle differences in the two files. And on those screenshots Audacity is reporting 48 for both. (Edit: If you have each image open in adjacent browser tabs then clicking between them also highlights the differences).īoth are showing up as 48 in Mediainfo. I can only tell by opening the first image in windows photos and then pressing the > arrow key to move on to the next one. Is there a reason for this that I am missing? The only thing I can think of is that "rendering" the file in Vegas is different to just saving/exporting in audacity? Is it something to be concerned about? I can't really tell any differences when playing the files back.Īt a glance I wouldn't be able to tell the differences between them.
However, I have noticed that there are differences between the two resulting.
#SONY VEGAS PRO 13 AUDACITY AUDIO EDITOR FULL#
I have 2 methods for extracting required audio from an mxf file.Īudacity - open mxf file > make stereo track from channels 1/2, which is the full stereo mix I require > Export as.
0 kommentar(er)
